Difference between revisions of "Talk:Version Control System"
From Freeside
m |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
That is all | That is all | ||
| − | |||
-- | -- | ||
| − | Goozbach | + | [[User:Goozbach|Goozbach]] |
I'll agree with the Git conversion. Plenty of tools to migrate, best userbase growth in the community. Lots of good tools for building for debian and rpm systems, as well as integrating with CPAN. | I'll agree with the Git conversion. Plenty of tools to migrate, best userbase growth in the community. Lots of good tools for building for debian and rpm systems, as well as integrating with CPAN. | ||
-- | -- | ||
| − | Jayce^ | + | [[User:Jayce|Jayce]]^ |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I checked out git, hg (mercurial) and bzr. I took a liking to bzr the most, git the least. i couldn't get any of them to import the whole cvs repo. help welcome in this area. (p.s. we'll host our own repository) | ||
| + | -- | ||
| + | [[User:Ivan|Ivan]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:34, 25 March 2010
+1 for git, It's easy to use, *EVERYONE* is using it. It's free to put an opensource project on github.com.
That is all -- Goozbach
I'll agree with the Git conversion. Plenty of tools to migrate, best userbase growth in the community. Lots of good tools for building for debian and rpm systems, as well as integrating with CPAN.
--
Jayce^
I checked out git, hg (mercurial) and bzr. I took a liking to bzr the most, git the least. i couldn't get any of them to import the whole cvs repo. help welcome in this area. (p.s. we'll host our own repository) -- Ivan
